Skip to content

What you can answer without multi-touch attribution

Losing path-level data does not lose you the budget question. Five things you can still answer, two you genuinely cannot, and a way to tell them apart.

Three platforms, three answers, one budget to defend. Your GA4 export already holds the answer, and the first finding is free and never leaves your browser. Get your first finding free

By , Founder & CEOUpdated 3 min read

Run the numbers for your store: the free customer journey credit calculator.

Almost every question that changes a budget is an aggregate question, and aggregate questions survive the loss of path-level tracking. The questions that do not survive are mostly ones that produce interesting slides rather than decisions.

Here is the split.

Still answerable

QuestionWhy aggregate data suffices
Should this channel get more or less budget?It compares outcomes across spend levels
Which channel should I test properly next?It only needs a ranking with uncertainty
Is my reported ROAS inflated, and by how much?It compares platform claims to real orders
Did last quarter's reallocation work?It compares two periods
What share of my orders can I explain at all?Coverage is an aggregate by definition

Not answerable

Two things genuinely go: the order in which a specific person encountered your channels, and any personalisation that depends on individual history. Both need the individual record.

The honest question is what the first one would have changed. In most DTC brands, path order informs a narrative about the funnel and does not move budget, because the budget decision is per channel and the path analysis is per person. Worth checking against your own last four quarters: how many budget changes were made because of a path insight?

The distinguishing test

Ask whether your question has a person in it. "Which channel caused revenue" has no person in it and is answerable from aggregates. "What did this customer see first" has a person in it and is not.

Most questions phrased as the second are actually the first wearing different clothes. "Does display assist conversions" sounds path-shaped, but the decision behind it is whether to fund display, which is a budget question and is better answered by turning display off in some regions and watching what happens. The geo testing guide covers that design.

What replaces the path chart

The report structure is set out in a defensible attribution report you can export.

Where to start

Run one read on a window you already have opinions about, and see whether the answers you needed are in it.

If a question you actually needed is missing, that is useful information about which tool you need, and it costs a lot less to find out this way than through a migration.

Frequently asked questions

  • Which marketing questions need path-level tracking?
    Only those with a specific person in them: the order in which an individual encountered your channels, and personalisation that depends on individual history. Budget allocation questions are per channel and therefore aggregate by nature.
  • How do I tell whether my question needs individual data?
    Ask whether the question has a person in it. Questions about what a channel caused are aggregate. Questions about what a particular customer did are individual. Most path-shaped questions turn out to be budget questions in different clothes.

Go deeper: Incrementality testing, explained.

Sixty-second versions of these ideas: Causality Engine on YouTube Shorts.

Have an audience of ecommerce operators? Earn 20% recurring commission by recommending the €99 read.

Keep reading

Terms in this article

Browse the full glossary

Your platforms guess.
We run the math.

Upload a GA4 export and see what each channel caused, next to last-click, in 1–2 minutes. The read is yours to keep.

The free finding runs in your browser. Your file never leaves it. The full read is €99, refundable within 30 days, no questions asked. Prices exclude VAT.