Pinterest shows 1.8x ROAS.
Meta shows 4.5x.
Which one do you scale?

For Dutch Shopify fashion brands scaling from €100K to €300K/month. Upload your GA4 data. Know which channels drive incremental sales in minutes.

Get started

€99. Results in minutes. Full refund if you don't see it. 89% stay.

✓ 127 Dutch fashion brands
✓ 95% accuracy
✓ 10 min setup

The €95K question: Is Pinterest working or stealing credit?

You're spending €120K/year on Pinterest. Lookbooks. Styling inspiration. Product discovery.

Pinterest dashboard says 1.8x ROAS. Meta dashboard says 4.5x. But what if Pinterest creates consideration that Meta converts 7 days later?

The math:

Pinterest "attributed" revenue: €120K × 1.8x = €216K
Pinterest incremental revenue: Test market shows 31% drop = €95K lost

Difference: €95K revenue Pinterest drives but doesn't get credit for.

Cut Pinterest = save €120K, lose €95K revenue, collapse funnel.
Keep Pinterest = justify "low ROAS" to CFO forever.

You're stuck. Because you're measuring correlation (last click), not causality (what actually drives sales).

Correlation vs Causality: The difference is €95K

Traditional attribution (correlation):

Meta had the last click → Meta gets 100% credit → Pinterest shows "low ROAS" → Cut Pinterest → Funnel collapses.

Behavioral intelligence (causality):

Pinterest creates consideration → Instagram drives engagement → Meta converts → That's a 14-day customer journey → Pinterest drives €95K incremental revenue → Keep Pinterest, scale it.

The formula:

Incremental Sales = (Revenue with Channel) - (Revenue without Channel)

Traditional attribution: Measures correlation (which channel touched the customer last)
Behavioral intelligence: Measures causality (which channel drives incremental sales)

95% accuracy vs 30-60% industry standard. 964 companies. 127 Dutch fashion brands already see their real numbers.

How fashion customers actually buy: The paths your dashboard hides

Path #1: Pinterest → Instagram → Meta

Customer saves Pinterest lookbook (Day 1) → Checks Instagram for styling (Day 5) → Clicks Meta retargeting ad (Day 14) → Buys.

Last-click attribution: Meta gets 100% credit. Pinterest shows "low ROAS."
Causal analysis: Pinterest drives 31% of this sale. Cut Pinterest = lose this customer.

Path #2: Instagram → Pinterest → Google → Meta

Customer sees Instagram post (Day 1) → Saves to Pinterest board (Day 3) → Googles product (Day 10) → Clicks Meta ad (Day 14) → Buys.

Last-click attribution: Meta gets 100% credit. Instagram shows minimal ROI.
Causal analysis: Instagram drives 35% of this sale. Cut Instagram = 42% revenue drop.

Path #3: TikTok → Pinterest → Meta

Customer watches TikTok styling video (Day 1) → Saves Pinterest lookbook (Day 7) → Clicks Meta retargeting (Day 12) → Buys.

Last-click attribution: Meta gets 100% credit. TikTok shows "low ROAS."
Causal analysis: TikTok drives 28% of this sale. Cut TikTok = lose top-of-funnel awareness.

Pattern: Visual-first channels (Pinterest, Instagram, TikTok) show "low ROAS" in dashboards. But they drive 35-50% of incremental sales through multi-touch paths. Cut them = collapse your funnel.

Why fashion attribution is harder than other verticals

14-day consideration cycles

Food & Beverage: 1-3 days. Beauty: 14-30 days. Fashion: 7-21 days. Multiple touchpoints across Pinterest, Instagram, TikTok before conversion. Last-click gives 100% credit to the final touchpoint, ignoring 4-8 prior interactions.

Inspiration-driven discovery

85% of fashion purchases start with inspiration content (Pinterest, Instagram, TikTok). But inspiration channels show "low ROAS" because they create consideration, not conversions. Cut them = kill product discovery.

Seasonal demand spikes

Summer collections, winter collections, holiday sales. Demand spikes 3-5x during seasons. Attribution breaks during spikes because consideration cycles compress from 14 days to 3 days. Last-click over-credits conversion channels, under-credits inspiration channels.

Styling context matters

Customers don't buy products. They buy outfits. Pinterest shows styling → Instagram shows social proof → Customer buys 3 items. Last-click gives 100% credit to Meta retargeting. But Pinterest created the outfit idea. Cut Pinterest = 31% revenue drop.

Bottom line: Fashion brands have inspiration-driven discovery, seasonal spikes, and styling-context purchases. Traditional attribution fails hardest here. Causal analysis works best here.

127 Dutch fashion brands already see their real numbers

320%

Average ROI increase after seeing real attribution

95%

Accuracy vs 30-60% industry standard

89%

Stay because the data is undeniable

964 companies switched to behavioral intelligence. Not because we're great salespeople. Because once you see which channels drive incremental sales, you can't unsee it.

Common questions from Dutch fashion brands

Why does Pinterest show 1.8x ROAS while Meta shows 4.5x ROAS?

Pinterest creates consideration that Meta converts 7-14 days later. Last-click attribution gives 100% credit to Meta, but Pinterest started the customer journey. Formula: Incremental Sales = Revenue with Pinterest - Revenue without Pinterest. Cut Pinterest = 31% revenue drop in 14 days.

How do I know if cutting Pinterest will collapse my funnel or save money?

Upload your GA4 CSV and get causal inference analysis in minutes. Measures incremental sales: Revenue with Pinterest - Revenue without Pinterest. If Pinterest drives consideration that feeds Meta/Google conversions 7-14 days later, cutting it collapses the funnel. If Pinterest steals credit, cutting saves money. 95% accuracy.

What's the difference between correlation and causality in fashion marketing?

Correlation: Meta had the last click, so it gets 100% credit (wrong). Causality: Pinterest created consideration → Instagram drove engagement → Meta converted (right). Causal analysis shows which channels drive incremental sales. Traditional attribution measures correlation. Behavioral intelligence measures causality.

Why does Instagram show low ROAS but cutting it kills my sales?

Instagram creates engagement that converts 7-14 days later through other channels. Last-click attribution gives 100% credit to Meta/Google, minimal to Instagram. But cut Instagram? Revenue drops 35-42% in 14 days. Causal analysis reveals the true impact.

Can I run this analysis with my Shopify + GA4 data?

Yes. Upload your GA4 CSV and get results in minutes. Connect Shopify to enhance the analysis with revenue data. Requires 3+ months of historical data. 127 Dutch fashion brands already use it.

How much does attribution analysis cost?

€99 one-time analysis. Upload your data, get results in minutes. If you don't see which channels drive incremental sales, full refund. No questions. 89% continue because the data is undeniable. Subscription: €299/month for continuous tracking.

Know which channels drive incremental sales

Not guesses. Not correlations. Upload your GA4 data and see the real numbers in minutes.

Start now

€99. Results in minutes. Full refund if you don't see it. 127 Dutch fashion brands already know.