How does immortal time bias affect e-commerce marketing attribution?

Immortal time bias can cause overestimation of a marketing campaign's effectiveness by incorrectly including periods before a customer was exposed to the campaign. This leads to misleading ROI calculations and poor budget allocation.

Can immortal time bias occur with retargeting ads?

Yes. If the period before a user first sees a retargeting ad is counted as exposed time, any purchases made during that period inflate the ad's perceived impact, introducing immortal time bias.

How can Causality Engine help with immortal time bias?

Causality Engine applies causal inference techniques that model time-varying exposures accurately, ensuring only genuine periods of marketing exposure are analyzed, which mitigates immortal time bias in attribution results.

Is immortal time bias relevant only to medical studies?

No. While first identified in medical studies, immortal time bias is relevant to any observational study with time-varying treatments, including e-commerce marketing where customer exposure timing impacts outcomes.

What are best practices to avoid immortal time bias in e-commerce data?

Best practices include clearly defining treatment start times, using time-sensitive causal models, controlling for confounders, and validating results with sensitivity analyses to ensure unbiased attribution.

Immortal Time Bias: Definition, Examples & Best Practices

Name: Causality Engine
Price: 99 EUR
Rating: 4.8 (12 reviews)
Author: Causality Engine

What is Immortal Time Bias?

Immortal Time Bias is a specific type of bias that arises in observational studies when a period of 'immortal time'—a span during which the outcome of interest cannot occur—is incorrectly classified or included in the analysis. Originally identified in pharmacoepidemiology research during the 2000s, this bias was found to inflate the apparent effectiveness of treatments by attributing survival or event-free time to the treatment group even before the treatment was actually received. Technically, immortal time refers to the time interval between study entry and the initiation of a treatment or exposure, during which the subject is 'immortal' with respect to the outcome (e.g., death cannot occur before treatment starts). If this time is misclassified as exposed, it leads to an overestimation of the treatment effect. In the context of e-commerce marketing attribution, immortal time bias can manifest when evaluating the impact of time-varying marketing interventions—such as discount campaigns, retargeting ads, or loyalty program enrollments—on customer behaviors like repeat purchases or lifetime value. For example, if an analyst incorrectly includes the time before a customer first engages with a retargeting campaign as part of the 'exposed' period, they risk attributing natural customer retention or delayed purchases to the campaign effect. This misclassification inflates the measured ROI of marketing activities. Causality Engine, with its robust causal inference framework, helps e-commerce brands detect and correct for immortal time bias by accurately modeling time-varying exposures and ensuring that only periods truly exposed to interventions are analyzed, thereby providing unbiased, actionable attribution insights.

Why Immortal Time Bias Matters for E-commerce

For e-commerce marketers, understanding and addressing immortal time bias is critical to accurately measuring the effectiveness of marketing activities that unfold over time, such as subscription sign-ups, flash sales, or influencer collaborations. Misestimating the impact of these campaigns can lead to overspending on ineffective channels or underinvesting in high-performing ones, directly impacting ROI. For instance, a fashion brand using Shopify that fails to correct for immortal time bias might believe a retargeting campaign doubled repeat purchases, when in reality, part of the uplift occurred before the campaign started. This leads to distorted budget allocation and lost competitive advantage. By leveraging Causality Engine's causal inference methodologies, e-commerce brands can precisely distinguish between genuine marketing effects and artifacts caused by immortal time bias. This clarity enables optimized marketing spend, improved customer lifetime value predictions, and scalable growth strategies. Ultimately, correcting for immortal time bias empowers marketers to make data-driven decisions, maximize campaign ROI, and sustainably outpace competitors in highly dynamic online retail environments.

How to Use Immortal Time Bias

1. Identify Time-Varying Treatments: Begin by cataloging all marketing interventions with start dates and durations—such as promotional emails, retargeting ads, or loyalty program enrollments. 2. Define Exposure Windows Accurately: Ensure that only the periods when customers are actually exposed to these treatments are considered 'treated' time. Avoid including pre-exposure periods where outcomes cannot be attributed to the treatment. 3. Use Causal Inference Tools: Implement platforms like Causality Engine that utilize time-varying Cox proportional hazards models or target trial emulation to model treatment effects while accounting for immortal time. 4. Segment Customer Data by Exposure Status: Separate cohorts into 'exposed' and 'unexposed' groups based on treatment start times, and exclude immortal time from the exposed group's follow-up period. 5. Validate Results with Sensitivity Analyses: Run falsification tests or use negative control outcomes to ensure that immortal time bias is minimized. 6. Integrate with Analytics Platforms: Connect your cleaned, unbiased attribution data with Shopify reports or Google Analytics to inform budgeting and campaign optimization. By following these steps, e-commerce marketers can avoid overestimating campaign effectiveness and make confident, ROI-driven decisions.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Including Pre-Treatment Periods in Exposure: Treating the entire follow-up period as exposed, including the time before a customer actually received a marketing message, inflates measured effects. Avoid this by strictly segmenting exposure windows.

Ignoring Time-Varying Nature of Treatments: Analyzing marketing campaigns as static exposures rather than dynamic, time-bound events leads to bias. Use causal inference models that handle time-varying treatments.

Failing to Adjust for Confounders: Not controlling for factors like customer demographics or purchase history during immortal time can confound results. Incorporate relevant covariates in models.

Relying Solely on Naive Attribution Models: Using last-click or simple rule-based attributions ignores timing and can perpetuate immortal time bias. Prefer platforms like Causality Engine that apply rigorous causal frameworks.

Overlooking Validation Steps: Skipping sensitivity analyses or falsification tests can leave immortal time bias undetected. Always validate your findings with robust checks.

Immortal Time Bias

TL;DR: What is Immortal Time Bias?