Last Updated: October 13, 2025
Your tracking is broken. Not "a bit off"—properly broken.
If you're still relying on pixel-only tracking in 2025, you're missing 40-60% of your conversions. Which means your ROAS (return on ad spend) calculations are fiction, your budget decisions are based on incomplete data, and you're probably cutting channels that actually work.
The culprit? iOS 14, cookie deprecation, ad blockers, and the general death of browser-based tracking.
The solution? Server-side tracking.
This guide will show you exactly how to implement server-side tracking for your Shopify store, why it matters, and what to expect when you finally see accurate data.
Let's fix your tracking.
Server-side tracking sends conversion data directly from your server to ad platforms, bypassing browsers entirely.
Instead of relying on a pixel in the customer's browser (which can be blocked), your server tells Meta, Google, and TikTok when conversions happen.
Traditional pixel tracking worked brilliantly until 2021. Then Apple released iOS 14 with App Tracking Transparency (ATT). Now:
Result: Your Meta Pixel is missing 40-60% of conversions. Your Google Ads tracking is missing 20-30%. Your attribution is a mess.
Server-side tracking bypasses all these limitations:
It's not optional anymore. It's the baseline for accurate tracking in 2025.
AspectClient-Side (Pixel)Server-SideHow it worksBrowser sends data to ad platformsYour server sends data to ad platformsiOS 14 impactMisses 75-85% of iOS usersTracks all usersAd blockersBlockedNot blockedCookie dependenceHighLowData accuracy60-70%90-95%Setup complexityEasyMediumPrivacy complianceChallengingBetter control
What it is: Meta's server-side tracking solution that sends conversion data directly from your server to Meta.
Benefits:
Cost: Free (but requires technical implementation)
What it is: Google's server-side solution that sends hashed customer data (email, phone) to improve conversion matching.
Benefits:
Cost: Free
What it is: TikTok's server-side tracking for sending conversion events directly to TikTok.
Benefits:
Cost: Free
Right. Let's get technical. Three implementation options, from easiest to most powerful.
Best for: Brands that want quick setup without technical complexity
Recommended apps:
Setup time: 30-60 minutes
Pros: Easy, no coding required, maintained by the app
Cons: Monthly cost, less customization, dependent on third party
Best for: Brands spending €20K+/month on ads who want full control
What you need:
Setup time: 4-8 hours
Cost: €50-200/month (Google Cloud hosting)
Pros: Full control, customizable, supports all platforms
Cons: Technical setup required, ongoing maintenance
Best for: Enterprise brands with development resources
What you need:
Setup time: 2-4 weeks
Cost: €5,000-20,000 implementation + ongoing maintenance
Pros: Complete control, maximum flexibility, best accuracy
Cons: Expensive, complex, requires technical expertise
Let's walk through the easiest implementation: using a Shopify app for Meta CAPI.
We recommend Elevar for most brands. It's reliable, well-supported, and handles Meta CAPI, Google Enhanced Conversions, and TikTok Events API.
Pricing: €50/month (up to €10K revenue) to €500/month (€1M+ revenue)
Elevar automatically tracks these events server-side:
Make sure all events are enabled and mapped correctly.
What you should see: Each event should show both "Browser" (from pixel) and "Server" (from CAPI). This is called "dual tracking" and gives you maximum accuracy.
Event Match Quality (EMQ) measures how well Meta can match your server events to user profiles. Higher EMQ = better attribution.
To improve EMQ:
Elevar handles this automatically. Your EMQ should be 6.0+ (out of 10).
After 7-14 days, compare your metrics:
Before CAPI:
After CAPI:
This isn't magic—you're just seeing conversions that were always happening but weren't being tracked.
For brands that want more control, GTM server-side is the gold standard.
Cost: €50-200/month depending on traffic volume
The problem: Removing your pixel entirely and going server-side only
Why it's wrong: You want BOTH. Pixel captures browser data (for users who allow tracking), server-side captures everything else. This is called "dual tracking" and gives maximum accuracy.
The fix: Keep your pixel. Add server-side. Use both.
The problem: Sending conversion events without customer email, phone, or name
Why it matters: Customer data helps platforms match conversions to user profiles. Without it, your Event Match Quality is low and attribution suffers.
The fix: Send hashed customer data (email, phone, name) with every purchase event. Most Shopify apps do this automatically.
The problem: Implementing server-side tracking but not verifying it works
The fix: Use Meta Events Manager Test Events, Google Ads conversion tracking reports, and GTM Preview mode to verify events are firing correctly.
The problem: Implementing CAPI and expecting instant ROAS improvement
The reality: It takes 7-14 days for platforms to ingest the new data and optimize. Be patient.
Based on data from 50+ Shopify brands we've helped implement server-side tracking:
Important: These improvements are in REPORTED metrics. Your actual revenue doesn't change—you're just seeing conversions that were always happening.
But here's the magic: Better data = better optimization = actually better performance over time.
One concern: "Isn't server-side tracking more invasive?"
Actually, no. It's more privacy-friendly:
Best practice: Still get user consent before sending data. Server-side doesn't exempt you from privacy laws.
Server-side tracking is the present. Here's the future:
Google's replacement for third-party cookies. Uses aggregate, anonymized data for attribution. Server-side tracking will be essential.
Brands that own customer data (email, phone, purchase history) will dominate. Server-side enables this.
The next evolution: using causal inference to determine which touchpoints actually caused conversions, not just correlated with them.
Right. Stop reading and take action:
Server-side tracking isn't optional anymore. It's the baseline for accurate attribution and profitable ROAS optimization.
The brands that implement it properly will have a massive advantage. Everyone else will keep making decisions based on incomplete data.
Your choice.
Yes, but use both. Server-side is more accurate (not affected by iOS 14, ad blockers, cookies), but pixel tracking still captures valuable browser data. Dual tracking (pixel + server-side) gives maximum accuracy.
Shopify apps: €50-500/month. Google Tag Manager server container: €50-200/month. Custom implementation: €5,000-20,000 setup. But the cost of NOT having it? Missing 40-60% of conversions and making bad budget decisions.
Shopify app: 30-60 minutes. GTM server-side: 4-8 hours. Custom implementation: 2-4 weeks.
Your reported ROAS will increase 25-40% because you'll see more conversions. Your actual ROAS doesn't change immediately—you're just seeing what was always there. But over time, better data = better optimization = genuinely better performance.
Not if you use a Shopify app (Elevar, Littledata, Trackify). For GTM server-side, basic technical knowledge helps but isn't required. For custom implementation, yes, you need a developer.
Yes, but you still need user consent before sending data. Server-side gives you more control over data, making compliance easier. But it doesn't exempt you from privacy laws.
EMQ measures how well Meta can match your server events to user profiles (score out of 10). Higher EMQ = better attribution. Improve it by sending hashed customer data (email, phone, name) with events. Aim for 6.0+.
No. Keep both. Pixel captures browser data for users who allow tracking. Server-side captures everything else. Dual tracking gives maximum accuracy.
Ready to stop guessing and start knowing? When Meta says one thing, Google says another, and Shopify shows different numbers entirely, it's time for accurate attribution. Discover how to get clarity on your true ROAS.
Ready for attribution that actually works? Causality Engine combines server-side tracking with causal inference to show you which marketing drives real, incremental revenue.
