Last Updated: October 13, 2025
The monthly board meeting at Metropolitan Hospital had been going smoothly until someone asked what seemed like a simple question: "Why did we run these tests twice?" The silence that followed spoke volumes. Carol, the Chief Medical Officer, stared at the data in front of her, her heart sinking. Two identical tests, same patient, three days apart, different departments. Each test cost €1,200. Neither department knew about the other's work (source).
Later that afternoon, Carol gathered her team in her office, the late afternoon sun casting long shadows across the walls covered in medical charts and workflow diagrams. "It's not just about the money," she explained, her voice carrying both frustration and determination. "Every duplicate test means a patient waited longer than necessary. Every disconnected piece of information means our doctors make decisions with incomplete data. We're all working hard, but something's missing in how our information flows" (source).
Across town at Central Memorial, Dr. James knows this challenge all too well. Last Tuesday, reviewing a complex case, he had that nagging feeling familiar to many experienced physicians – he'd seen this pattern before. But finding that connection proved far more challenging than recognizing it. Three days and countless hours of records searches later, he finally found what he was looking for: similar cases scattered across different departments, their connections invisible until someone happened to notice.
"The information is all here," he said one morning, gesturing at his monitors during rounds with his residents. "We have more data than ever. But seeing how it all connects? That's like trying to see constellations with the stars scattered across different skies".
Sarah, a diagnostic specialist at Eastern Health, recently made a discovery that illuminates this challenge perfectly. She noticed that certain combinations of test results seemed to tell a clearer story when viewed together – but only if someone thought to look for the connection. "It's like having pieces of different puzzles," she explained to her colleagues during a department meeting. "Sometimes they fit together in ways we never expected, but only if we can see all the pieces at once" .
This insight resonated with the emergency department team at River Valley Medical. They'd started paying closer attention to how information flowed between shifts, discovering that some of their best insights came from connecting seemingly unrelated observations from different times and teams. A patient's subtle symptom noted during the night shift might take on new significance when viewed alongside a different team's observations twelve hours later.
Think of healthcare data like a city at night, suggests Dr. James. From the ground, you see individual lights – discrete pieces of information that illuminate small areas. But from above, patterns emerge neighborhoods, thoroughfares, centers of activity. These patterns tell stories about how the city works, how people move, where connections exist.
Healthcare organizations are beginning to explore these different perspectives on their information. At Eastern Health, Sarah's team has started experimenting with new ways of visualizing patient data, looking for connections that might not be obvious in traditional medical records. They've already discovered that certain combinations of information can dramatically improve care decisions, but they suspect they're still missing many important patterns.
Carol sits in her office late one evening, watching the city lights come on outside her window. The duplicate tests that sparked this conversation seem almost symbolic now – a visible symptom of a deeper challenge. How many other connections are they missing? How many insights remain hidden in their data, waiting to be discovered?
We're gathering a small group of healthcare organizations interested in exploring these patterns together. Not with promises of perfect solutions, but with curiosity about what we might discover. Every healthcare organization has its own unique story, its own patterns waiting to be understood.
The question isn't whether these connections exist – it's whether we can learn to see them. What might we discover if we looked at our information differently? How might patient care improve if we could better connect the dots between different pieces of data, different departments, different observations?
As the sun sets over Metropolitan Hospital, Carol reviews the notes from today's discussions. In them, she sees not just challenges but opportunities. Every connection we discover, every pattern we understand, brings us closer to better patient care. The journey may not be simple, but it's one worth taking.
For those curious about exploring these questions in their own organizations, the conversation begins with a simple step: looking at our information not just as individual pieces, but as parts of a larger story waiting to be understood. What patterns might we discover in your healthcare data? What connections have you observed but struggled to systematically capture? How might we learn together?
Struggling with attribution discrepancies? If you're spending €100K+ per month on ads and can't tell which channels are actually driving sales, you're not alone. Learn how leading Shopify beauty and fashion brands are solving attribution challenges to scale profitably.
The path to better healthcare information flow may not be straightforward, but in exploring these questions together, we might just discover new ways of seeing the connections that matter most to patient care.
Healthcare Data Interoperability and Integration
How Data Integration is Transforming Patient Care
